Do you name your assemblies consistently (<CompanyName>.<ComponentName>)?

Last updated by Nick Curran [SSW] 4 months ago.See history

This rule has been archived

Assembly names should reflect the the functionality that it provides. For example,


contains all the classes that deal with inputs and outputs. As a general rule of thumb your assemblies should be named as follows:

<CompanyName>.<ComponentName> (e.g. SSW.Framework)

This allows a developer to know who developed the assembly and give the developer a general idea of what the assembly can be used for.

We open source. Powered by GitHub